<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1375 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375748</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the order extending the period for issuing Show Cause Notices without a personal hearing was not sustainable. The Tribunal set aside the orders, allowed the appeals, and ordered the return of the seized goods to the appellants. It reiterated that the amendment to Section 110(2) of the Customs Act does not eliminate the need for a Show Cause Notice and a reasoned order after hearing the affected party.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2019 16:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=559766" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1375 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375748</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the order extending the period for issuing Show Cause Notices without a personal hearing was not sustainable. The Tribunal set aside the orders, allowed the appeals, and ordered the return of the seized goods to the appellants. It reiterated that the amendment to Section 110(2) of the Customs Act does not eliminate the need for a Show Cause Notice and a reasoned order after hearing the affected party.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375748</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>