<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1373 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375746</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act, citing the debatable nature of simultaneous deduction claims under sections 80 HHC and 80 IA. The ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the conflicting decisions of different courts and tribunals on the issue and finding no reason to interfere with the CIT(A)&#039;s findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2019 05:26:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=559763" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1373 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375746</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act, citing the debatable nature of simultaneous deduction claims under sections 80 HHC and 80 IA. The ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the conflicting decisions of different courts and tribunals on the issue and finding no reason to interfere with the CIT(A)&#039;s findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375746</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>