<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1370 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375743</link>
    <description>The Tribunal maintained jurisdiction over the appeal, rejecting the Department&#039;s request to transfer it to the Anti-Dumping Duty Bench. Regarding the applicability of Anti-Dumping Duty on imported second-hand machinery, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that the Duty should not apply to second-hand machinery as per the Notification&#039;s scope. The decision emphasized protecting domestic industries in line with the Anti-Dumping measures&#039; purpose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 11:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=559759" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1370 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375743</link>
      <description>The Tribunal maintained jurisdiction over the appeal, rejecting the Department&#039;s request to transfer it to the Anti-Dumping Duty Bench. Regarding the applicability of Anti-Dumping Duty on imported second-hand machinery, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that the Duty should not apply to second-hand machinery as per the Notification&#039;s scope. The decision emphasized protecting domestic industries in line with the Anti-Dumping measures&#039; purpose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375743</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>