<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1369 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375742</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s findings that workstations, credenzas, and bought-out items were not excisable goods. The Revenue failed to provide evidence to the contrary, and the Tribunal dismissed their appeals, affirming the Commissioner&#039;s decision based on the Supreme Court&#039;s test in the Craft Interiors case. The order was pronounced on 20/02/2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2019 15:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=559757" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1369 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375742</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s findings that workstations, credenzas, and bought-out items were not excisable goods. The Revenue failed to provide evidence to the contrary, and the Tribunal dismissed their appeals, affirming the Commissioner&#039;s decision based on the Supreme Court&#039;s test in the Craft Interiors case. The order was pronounced on 20/02/2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375742</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>