<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1350 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375723</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that the cenvat credit taken based on the first stage dealer invoice, even if issued by the importer, was admissible. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2019 05:22:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=559730" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1350 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375723</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that the cenvat credit taken based on the first stage dealer invoice, even if issued by the importer, was admissible. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375723</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>