<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1348 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375721</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the application for condonation of delay, ruling that the government department&#039;s 780-day delay in filing the appeal against a service tax order was unjustifiable due to negligence. Ignorance of the law was not accepted as a valid reason for the significant delay, especially for a government entity. Emphasizing the importance of adhering to statutory time limits, the tribunal held that the delay was a result of the appellant&#039;s negligence and lack of reasonable explanation, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2019 05:22:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=559728" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1348 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375721</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the application for condonation of delay, ruling that the government department&#039;s 780-day delay in filing the appeal against a service tax order was unjustifiable due to negligence. Ignorance of the law was not accepted as a valid reason for the significant delay, especially for a government entity. Emphasizing the importance of adhering to statutory time limits, the tribunal held that the delay was a result of the appellant&#039;s negligence and lack of reasonable explanation, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375721</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>