<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1343 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375716</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG) and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The Tribunal emphasized the correct application of tax provisions and the assessment of Capital Gains in the hands of the appropriate entities involved in the property transactions. The property had already been assessed in the hands of the entity that purchased it from the assessee, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2019 05:21:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=559721" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1343 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375716</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG) and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The Tribunal emphasized the correct application of tax provisions and the assessment of Capital Gains in the hands of the appropriate entities involved in the property transactions. The property had already been assessed in the hands of the entity that purchased it from the assessee, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375716</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>