<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (4) TMI 129 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16971</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioners, directors of a company, in a case concerning their liability under section 179 of the Income-tax Act. The court emphasized that directors&#039; liability is joint and several only when tax cannot be recovered from the company&#039;s assets. It quashed the proceedings initiated by the Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, stating that without a finding that the tax amount cannot be recovered from the company, the Assessing Officer lacks jurisdiction to invoke section 179. The judgment underscored the importance of due process and proper jurisdictional requirements before holding directors personally liable for the company&#039;s tax liabilities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:10:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55971" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (4) TMI 129 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16971</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioners, directors of a company, in a case concerning their liability under section 179 of the Income-tax Act. The court emphasized that directors&#039; liability is joint and several only when tax cannot be recovered from the company&#039;s assets. It quashed the proceedings initiated by the Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, stating that without a finding that the tax amount cannot be recovered from the company, the Assessing Officer lacks jurisdiction to invoke section 179. The judgment underscored the importance of due process and proper jurisdictional requirements before holding directors personally liable for the company&#039;s tax liabilities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16971</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>