<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1491 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278900</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court overturned the High Court&#039;s decision in a contempt case where the appellant was accused of willful breach for failing to return documents destroyed in a natural calamity. The Supreme Court found no intentional violation of the undertaking, emphasizing that holding the appellant in contempt for an impossible task was unjust. The appellant&#039;s guilt was dismissed, the High Court&#039;s judgment was set aside, and the appeal was allowed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2019 14:02:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=559700" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1491 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278900</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court overturned the High Court&#039;s decision in a contempt case where the appellant was accused of willful breach for failing to return documents destroyed in a natural calamity. The Supreme Court found no intentional violation of the undertaking, emphasizing that holding the appellant in contempt for an impossible task was unjust. The appellant&#039;s guilt was dismissed, the High Court&#039;s judgment was set aside, and the appeal was allowed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278900</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>