https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278883 Wilful disobedience of clear interim restraint orders, including transfers, receipt of consideration and creation of third-party interests in suit property, was held to constitute civil contempt. The Court found that the operative orders barred creation of any interest and later required notice before third-party rights could be created, yet the respondents acted during the restraint period and gave notice only after rights had already arisen. Their explanation was rejected as inconsistent with the record, and the orders were treated as unambiguous. The apology was not accepted because it lacked genuine contrition and was tendered after deliberate breach had been established. Simple imprisonment was imposed. en-us Mon, 21 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 23 Feb 2019 12:37:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278883 Wilful disobedience of clear interim restraint orders, including transfers, receipt of consideration and creation of third-party interests in suit property, was held to constitute civil contempt. The Court found that the operative orders barred creation of any interest and later required notice before third-party rights could be created, yet the respondents acted during the restraint period and gave notice only after rights had already arisen. Their explanation was rejected as inconsistent with the record, and the orders were treated as unambiguous. The apology was not accepted because it lacked genuine contrition and was tendered after deliberate breach had been established. Simple imprisonment was imposed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 21 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278883