<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 1061 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278883</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court found the respondents guilty of civil contempt for willfully disobeying its interim orders by transferring the disputed property without notice to the petitioners. The respondents&#039; defense and apology were deemed insincere, leading to a punishment of two weeks&#039; simple imprisonment to uphold the judiciary&#039;s authority and ensure order compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2019 12:37:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=559650" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 1061 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278883</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court found the respondents guilty of civil contempt for willfully disobeying its interim orders by transferring the disputed property without notice to the petitioners. The respondents&#039; defense and apology were deemed insincere, leading to a punishment of two weeks&#039; simple imprisonment to uphold the judiciary&#039;s authority and ensure order compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278883</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>