<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (5) TMI 7 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16965</link>
    <description>The High Court, following a Supreme Court decision, upheld the Tribunal&#039;s view in favor of the assessee, ruling against the Revenue. The case clarified that where transactions involve mutuality and pertain to partnership funds, section 40(b) does not hinder quantifying interest based on such mutuality. The judgment emphasizes the significance of considering mutuality in transactions for determining interest deductions under the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:58:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55965" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (5) TMI 7 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16965</link>
      <description>The High Court, following a Supreme Court decision, upheld the Tribunal&#039;s view in favor of the assessee, ruling against the Revenue. The case clarified that where transactions involve mutuality and pertain to partnership funds, section 40(b) does not hinder quantifying interest based on such mutuality. The judgment emphasizes the significance of considering mutuality in transactions for determining interest deductions under the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16965</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>