<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (3) TMI 248 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278882</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the defendant for contempt of court due to deliberate violation of court orders and undertakings given to the High Court of Gujarat. Despite receiving notice, the defendant failed to comply with the undertakings to vacate the premises and clear arrears of mesne profits. The court considered the undertakings equivalent to an injunction, emphasizing the seriousness of breaching such commitments. The defendant&#039;s lack of remorse further demonstrated intentional disregard for the court&#039;s directives. Consequently, the Supreme Court affirmed the High Court&#039;s decision, sentencing the defendant to three months&#039; imprisonment in civil jail and dismissing the appeal with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2019 12:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=559646" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (3) TMI 248 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278882</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the defendant for contempt of court due to deliberate violation of court orders and undertakings given to the High Court of Gujarat. Despite receiving notice, the defendant failed to comply with the undertakings to vacate the premises and clear arrears of mesne profits. The court considered the undertakings equivalent to an injunction, emphasizing the seriousness of breaching such commitments. The defendant&#039;s lack of remorse further demonstrated intentional disregard for the court&#039;s directives. Consequently, the Supreme Court affirmed the High Court&#039;s decision, sentencing the defendant to three months&#039; imprisonment in civil jail and dismissing the appeal with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278882</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>