<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (5) TMI 378 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278878</link>
    <description>The court found no deliberate disobedience by jail officials in the delayed release of convict Ahmed Ali. The Superintendent and Jailor&#039;s apologies, along with the Assistant Jailor&#039;s candid statement, were considered. Ahmed Ali was awarded Rs. 2,000 in compensation for his undue detention. The court emphasized the need to avoid such incidents in the future, warning of severe consequences if they reoccur.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2019 11:42:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=559639" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (5) TMI 378 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278878</link>
      <description>The court found no deliberate disobedience by jail officials in the delayed release of convict Ahmed Ali. The Superintendent and Jailor&#039;s apologies, along with the Assistant Jailor&#039;s candid statement, were considered. Ahmed Ali was awarded Rs. 2,000 in compensation for his undue detention. The court emphasized the need to avoid such incidents in the future, warning of severe consequences if they reoccur.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278878</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>