https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278876 Civil contempt requires proof of wilful disobedience, meaning a deliberate and intentional breach of a court direction that was capable of compliance in ordinary circumstances, and the failure must be directly attributable to the persons proceeded against. On the materials, non-implementation of the rehabilitation scheme was linked to intervening factors, including disputes over the tripartite agreement, operational difficulties, power supply issues, and financial and logistical constraints. The record did not show any respondent had intentionally or deliberately breached the Court's directions. Civil contempt was therefore not established. en-us Fri, 05 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Jul 2024 16:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278876 Civil contempt requires proof of wilful disobedience, meaning a deliberate and intentional breach of a court direction that was capable of compliance in ordinary circumstances, and the failure must be directly attributable to the persons proceeded against. On the materials, non-implementation of the rehabilitation scheme was linked to intervening factors, including disputes over the tripartite agreement, operational difficulties, power supply issues, and financial and logistical constraints. The record did not show any respondent had intentionally or deliberately breached the Court's directions. Civil contempt was therefore not established. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 05 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278876