<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1338 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375711</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court of India granted leave in the case with citation 2019 (2) TMI 1338 - SC. Justices Nariman and Saran presided. Counsels for the petitioner were Agarwal, Mittal, and Kumar, while counsels for the respondent were Jain, Prasad, Annapoorani, Katiyar, Mandal, and Suj.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2019 08:57:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=559617" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1338 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375711</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court of India granted leave in the case with citation 2019 (2) TMI 1338 - SC. Justices Nariman and Saran presided. Counsels for the petitioner were Agarwal, Mittal, and Kumar, while counsels for the respondent were Jain, Prasad, Annapoorani, Katiyar, Mandal, and Suj.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375711</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>