https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375707 The Court addressed jurisdictional issues under the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988 as amended in 2016. It determined that the 2016 amendments significantly impacted jurisdiction, treating them as almost a new enactment. The validity of a show-cause notice issued for a 2011 transaction was contested, with arguments on accrued rights and the timeline for passing orders under Section 26(7) of the Act. The Court emphasized its authority to decide on jurisdictional matters and stayed the impugned judgment and order, admitting the appeal for expedited hearing while directing parties to refrain from actions regarding the subject property. en-us Mon, 28 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Dec 2019 18:38:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375707 The Court addressed jurisdictional issues under the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988 as amended in 2016. It determined that the 2016 amendments significantly impacted jurisdiction, treating them as almost a new enactment. The validity of a show-cause notice issued for a 2011 transaction was contested, with arguments on accrued rights and the timeline for passing orders under Section 26(7) of the Act. The Court emphasized its authority to decide on jurisdictional matters and stayed the impugned judgment and order, admitting the appeal for expedited hearing while directing parties to refrain from actions regarding the subject property. Case-Laws Benami Property Mon, 28 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375707