https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375701 Questions on deductions under sections 80HHC and 80HHD were treated as covered by an earlier binding decision in the assessee's own case, which remained binding on a coordinate Bench because it had not been set aside by the Supreme Court. Purely factual questions were not entertained in the section 260A appeal. The issues were therefore answered consistently with the earlier judgment and in favour of the assessee. en-us Wed, 27 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 23 Feb 2019 08:57:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375701 Questions on deductions under sections 80HHC and 80HHD were treated as covered by an earlier binding decision in the assessee's own case, which remained binding on a coordinate Bench because it had not been set aside by the Supreme Court. Purely factual questions were not entertained in the section 260A appeal. The issues were therefore answered consistently with the earlier judgment and in favour of the assessee. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 27 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375701