<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1326 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375699</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes, withdrawing one appeal and restoring the second appeal challenging the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act back to the CIT(A) for proper adjudication. The Tribunal emphasized the need for the CIT(A) to address legal grounds raised by the parties and provide a fair opportunity for the assessee to present their case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2019 08:57:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=559605" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1326 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375699</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes, withdrawing one appeal and restoring the second appeal challenging the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act back to the CIT(A) for proper adjudication. The Tribunal emphasized the need for the CIT(A) to address legal grounds raised by the parties and provide a fair opportunity for the assessee to present their case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375699</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>