<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1325 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375698</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, quashing the penalties imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The decision, pronounced on 20/02/2019, emphasized the necessity of clear penalty notices under Section 274, aligning with judicial precedents favoring the assessee when ambiguity exists in the notice specifying charges for &quot;concealment of income&quot; or &quot;furnishing inaccurate particulars of income.&quot;</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2019 08:57:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=559604" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1325 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375698</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, quashing the penalties imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The decision, pronounced on 20/02/2019, emphasized the necessity of clear penalty notices under Section 274, aligning with judicial precedents favoring the assessee when ambiguity exists in the notice specifying charges for &quot;concealment of income&quot; or &quot;furnishing inaccurate particulars of income.&quot;</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375698</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>