<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1311 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375684</link>
    <description>The Tribunal waived the penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, for the Appellants as they acted in good faith, promptly paying the service tax upon notification and demonstrating no intent to evade payment. The interest liability was upheld, but the penalty was waived based on the absence of mens rea. The appeal was disposed of accordingly, in line with legal principles and precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2019 08:55:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=559590" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1311 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375684</link>
      <description>The Tribunal waived the penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, for the Appellants as they acted in good faith, promptly paying the service tax upon notification and demonstrating no intent to evade payment. The interest liability was upheld, but the penalty was waived based on the absence of mens rea. The appeal was disposed of accordingly, in line with legal principles and precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375684</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>