https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375680 The Member (Judicial) reduced the penalty imposed under Section 76 to 25% of the total penalty amount, which had already been deposited by the appellant. The penalty under Section 78 was set aside, and the remaining penalty under Section 76 was deemed unnecessary and also set aside. The appeal was disposed of with this decision, providing a fair resolution to the dispute regarding the imposition of penalties under the Finance Act, 1994. en-us Tue, 05 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 23 Feb 2019 08:55:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375680 The Member (Judicial) reduced the penalty imposed under Section 76 to 25% of the total penalty amount, which had already been deposited by the appellant. The penalty under Section 78 was set aside, and the remaining penalty under Section 76 was deemed unnecessary and also set aside. The appeal was disposed of with this decision, providing a fair resolution to the dispute regarding the imposition of penalties under the Finance Act, 1994. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 05 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375680