<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1304 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375677</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed for remand to verify the execution of work with material and determine if the service fell under works contract service. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of verifying these facts before making a decision on the eligibility of abatement and classification of services.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2019 08:55:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=559583" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1304 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375677</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed for remand to verify the execution of work with material and determine if the service fell under works contract service. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of verifying these facts before making a decision on the eligibility of abatement and classification of services.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375677</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>