https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375674 The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, upholding the decision to set aside the demand for central excise duty on Bagasse, pressmud, and composed fertilizer. The judgment reaffirmed that Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 did not apply to waste or byproducts, such as those arising during the production of sugar and molasses. The ruling was based on established legal principles and previous judgments, emphasizing the distinction between manufactured goods and agricultural waste in determining the applicability of central excise duty. en-us Thu, 21 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 23 Feb 2019 08:54:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375674 The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, upholding the decision to set aside the demand for central excise duty on Bagasse, pressmud, and composed fertilizer. The judgment reaffirmed that Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 did not apply to waste or byproducts, such as those arising during the production of sugar and molasses. The ruling was based on established legal principles and previous judgments, emphasizing the distinction between manufactured goods and agricultural waste in determining the applicability of central excise duty. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 21 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375674