<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1966 (12) TMI 75 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278841</link>
    <description>The court allowed the petition, quashing the impugned orders and awarding costs to the petitioner. The judgment emphasized upholding natural justice principles and ensuring accused individuals have a fair opportunity to present their case. The final disposition involved the dismissal of the petition, concluding the legal proceedings regarding the confiscation of gold and the imposition of penalties under the Sea Customs Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2019 15:26:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=559496" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1966 (12) TMI 75 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278841</link>
      <description>The court allowed the petition, quashing the impugned orders and awarding costs to the petitioner. The judgment emphasized upholding natural justice principles and ensuring accused individuals have a fair opportunity to present their case. The final disposition involved the dismissal of the petition, concluding the legal proceedings regarding the confiscation of gold and the imposition of penalties under the Sea Customs Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278841</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>