<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (8) TMI 50 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16949</link>
    <description>The court held that the assessee was not entitled to weighted deduction for export expenses, export inspecting agency charges, and bank commission under section 35B of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal was directed to verify if the expenditure on sea freight and marine insurance was incurred in connection with the execution of a contract for the supply of goods outside India, and if so, the weighted deduction should be allowed for those specific expenditures.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:23:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55949" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (8) TMI 50 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16949</link>
      <description>The court held that the assessee was not entitled to weighted deduction for export expenses, export inspecting agency charges, and bank commission under section 35B of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal was directed to verify if the expenditure on sea freight and marine insurance was incurred in connection with the execution of a contract for the supply of goods outside India, and if so, the weighted deduction should be allowed for those specific expenditures.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16949</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>