<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (3) TMI 115 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16940</link>
    <description>The High Court rejected the Revenue&#039;s petition seeking a mandamus to refer a question of law regarding the deduction under section 80HHC to the assessee-company. The Court emphasized the importance of maintaining consistency in issues raised throughout the appeal process and cited legal precedent to support its decision. The petition was dismissed without any order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:55:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55940" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (3) TMI 115 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16940</link>
      <description>The High Court rejected the Revenue&#039;s petition seeking a mandamus to refer a question of law regarding the deduction under section 80HHC to the assessee-company. The Court emphasized the importance of maintaining consistency in issues raised throughout the appeal process and cited legal precedent to support its decision. The petition was dismissed without any order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16940</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>