https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375659 The Allahabad High Court directed the release of seized goods and vehicle upon submission of a Bank Guarantee for the applicable tax, interest, and penalty. The petitioner, challenging a detention order and notice, claimed to have paid the required tax, while authorities argued otherwise. The court emphasized the need for a Bank Guarantee under Rule 140 to secure release, with the petitioner agreeing to comply. The judgment allowed the petitioner to challenge any future orders if dissatisfied, resolving the matter with the condition of furnishing the Bank Guarantee for prompt release within ten days. en-us Thu, 14 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Feb 2025 13:18:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375659 The Allahabad High Court directed the release of seized goods and vehicle upon submission of a Bank Guarantee for the applicable tax, interest, and penalty. The petitioner, challenging a detention order and notice, claimed to have paid the required tax, while authorities argued otherwise. The court emphasized the need for a Bank Guarantee under Rule 140 to secure release, with the petitioner agreeing to comply. The judgment allowed the petitioner to challenge any future orders if dissatisfied, resolving the matter with the condition of furnishing the Bank Guarantee for prompt release within ten days. Case-Laws GST Thu, 14 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375659