<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1281 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375654</link>
    <description>The court upheld the notice of reopening of assessment for the assessment year 2011-12 issued to a real estate company. The Assessing Officer had valid reasons, supported by material from a search action, indicating unexplained cash credit. Despite the petitioner&#039;s objections of lack of a live link and change of opinion, the court found the reasons recorded justified reassessment. Citing a Supreme Court precedent, the court emphasized that reassessment can be initiated based on subsequent reliable information showing non-disclosure of material facts. The court rejected the petitioner&#039;s arguments, dismissing the petition and vacating interim relief previously granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2019 10:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=559390" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1281 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375654</link>
      <description>The court upheld the notice of reopening of assessment for the assessment year 2011-12 issued to a real estate company. The Assessing Officer had valid reasons, supported by material from a search action, indicating unexplained cash credit. Despite the petitioner&#039;s objections of lack of a live link and change of opinion, the court found the reasons recorded justified reassessment. Citing a Supreme Court precedent, the court emphasized that reassessment can be initiated based on subsequent reliable information showing non-disclosure of material facts. The court rejected the petitioner&#039;s arguments, dismissing the petition and vacating interim relief previously granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375654</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>