<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1247 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375620</link>
    <description>An institute providing foreign trade training was treated as a vocational training institute for the period when the relevant service tax exemptions were in force, because the training related to statutory compliances, procedures and foreign trade requirements; service tax did not survive for that exempt period. For the interregnum when the notifications were not operative, the remaining liability was remanded for limited recomputation, with cum-tax benefit to be considered if admissible in law. Penalty was set aside because the dispute had remained under litigation throughout the relevant period, indicating no basis for penal action.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2019 06:10:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=559356" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1247 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375620</link>
      <description>An institute providing foreign trade training was treated as a vocational training institute for the period when the relevant service tax exemptions were in force, because the training related to statutory compliances, procedures and foreign trade requirements; service tax did not survive for that exempt period. For the interregnum when the notifications were not operative, the remaining liability was remanded for limited recomputation, with cum-tax benefit to be considered if admissible in law. Penalty was set aside because the dispute had remained under litigation throughout the relevant period, indicating no basis for penal action.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375620</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>