<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1245 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375618</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal overturned the decision of the Adjudicating Authority and Commissioner (Appeals) in a case involving discrepancies in ST-3 Returns and Cenvat credit. Errors in demand calculation were rectified, leading to no demand payable by the appellant. The Tribunal found no intent to evade payment and set aside the penalty under Section 78. The appellant&#039;s appeal was disposed of in their favor.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2019 06:10:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=559354" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1245 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375618</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal overturned the decision of the Adjudicating Authority and Commissioner (Appeals) in a case involving discrepancies in ST-3 Returns and Cenvat credit. Errors in demand calculation were rectified, leading to no demand payable by the appellant. The Tribunal found no intent to evade payment and set aside the penalty under Section 78. The appellant&#039;s appeal was disposed of in their favor.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375618</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>