<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1243 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375616</link>
    <description>The appeals were dismissed as the buyer&#039;s refund claims were filed after the six-month limitation period prescribed by Section 11B of the Central Excise Act. The judgment reaffirmed the distinction between the rights of the manufacturer and the buyer in claiming refunds, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision based on legal precedents and statutory provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2019 10:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=559352" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1243 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375616</link>
      <description>The appeals were dismissed as the buyer&#039;s refund claims were filed after the six-month limitation period prescribed by Section 11B of the Central Excise Act. The judgment reaffirmed the distinction between the rights of the manufacturer and the buyer in claiming refunds, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision based on legal precedents and statutory provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375616</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>