<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1234 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375607</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the department&#039;s decision, ruling that the appellant incorrectly availed and utilized Cenvat Credit for advertisement services attributed to the Jammu and Kashmir unit in the Kadi unit where the exemption did not apply. The judgment emphasized the strict interpretation of Rule 3(4) and found the SCN&#039;s allegations sufficient to justify the denial of credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2019 13:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=559343" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1234 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375607</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the department&#039;s decision, ruling that the appellant incorrectly availed and utilized Cenvat Credit for advertisement services attributed to the Jammu and Kashmir unit in the Kadi unit where the exemption did not apply. The judgment emphasized the strict interpretation of Rule 3(4) and found the SCN&#039;s allegations sufficient to justify the denial of credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375607</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>