<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1227 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375600</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, ruling that cenvat credit for steel materials used in the structure of plant and machinery was admissible based on the High Court judgment. However, as there was no verification on the allocation of materials between support structures and factory sheds, cenvat credit for materials used in the factory shed was not allowed. The matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for further verification and a fresh decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2019 06:08:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=559336" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1227 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375600</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, ruling that cenvat credit for steel materials used in the structure of plant and machinery was admissible based on the High Court judgment. However, as there was no verification on the allocation of materials between support structures and factory sheds, cenvat credit for materials used in the factory shed was not allowed. The matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for further verification and a fresh decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375600</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>