<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1786 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278822</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal against the CIT(A) order due to the tax effect being less than Rs. 10,00,000. Section 268A of the Income Tax Act, along with CBDT Circular No.21 of 2015, mandates setting monetary limits for appeals. The Circular clarified that appeals should focus on merit, not just exceeding monetary limits. The judgment underscores the importance of adhering to these guidelines to streamline the appeal process and avoid unnecessary litigation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2023 13:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=559317" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1786 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278822</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal against the CIT(A) order due to the tax effect being less than Rs. 10,00,000. Section 268A of the Income Tax Act, along with CBDT Circular No.21 of 2015, mandates setting monetary limits for appeals. The Circular clarified that appeals should focus on merit, not just exceeding monetary limits. The judgment underscores the importance of adhering to these guidelines to streamline the appeal process and avoid unnecessary litigation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278822</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>