https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278831 Enforcement of a foreign award under Part II of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is confined to the limited objections permitted by Sections 47, 48 and 49, and procedural complaints alone do not defeat maintainability. On the facts, notice invoking arbitration had been issued, the judgment-debtor was given an opportunity to appoint an arbitrator, and the applicable GAFTA procedure had been followed. Allegations of absence of amicable settlement, irregular appointment, and improper tribunal constitution were unsupported by material showing a sustainable bar to enforcement, so the execution application was held maintainable and the foreign award treated as enforceable for that purpose. en-us Thu, 04 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 22 Feb 2019 06:06:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278831 Enforcement of a foreign award under Part II of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is confined to the limited objections permitted by Sections 47, 48 and 49, and procedural complaints alone do not defeat maintainability. On the facts, notice invoking arbitration had been issued, the judgment-debtor was given an opportunity to appoint an arbitrator, and the applicable GAFTA procedure had been followed. Allegations of absence of amicable settlement, irregular appointment, and improper tribunal constitution were unsupported by material showing a sustainable bar to enforcement, so the execution application was held maintainable and the foreign award treated as enforceable for that purpose. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 04 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278831