https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278803 The Tribunal found no delay in filing the appeal, accepting the applicant's argument that it was within the statutory time limit. The communication of the impugned order was not in accordance with the Act, leading to the acceptance of the claimed date. Lack of proper substantiation by the Revenue regarding the receipt date supported the applicant. The Tribunal emphasized the statutory provisions on order communication. As the appeal was filed within the time limit, no COD application was required, and the appeal was scheduled for hearing. en-us Fri, 08 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 22 Feb 2019 06:06:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278803 The Tribunal found no delay in filing the appeal, accepting the applicant's argument that it was within the statutory time limit. The communication of the impugned order was not in accordance with the Act, leading to the acceptance of the claimed date. Lack of proper substantiation by the Revenue regarding the receipt date supported the applicant. The Tribunal emphasized the statutory provisions on order communication. As the appeal was filed within the time limit, no COD application was required, and the appeal was scheduled for hearing. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 08 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278803