<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1785 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278805</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision on the limitation period for Service Tax liability. The adjudicating authority&#039;s refusal to adjust amounts paid during proceedings was overturned, directing a refund after adjusting confirmed duty liability and interest. The penalty under Section 76 was set aside by invoking Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994, due to the appellant&#039;s status as a State Government Body. The appeals were disposed of with instructions to refund the amounts paid and cancel the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2019 06:06:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=559304" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1785 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278805</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision on the limitation period for Service Tax liability. The adjudicating authority&#039;s refusal to adjust amounts paid during proceedings was overturned, directing a refund after adjusting confirmed duty liability and interest. The penalty under Section 76 was set aside by invoking Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994, due to the appellant&#039;s status as a State Government Body. The appeals were disposed of with instructions to refund the amounts paid and cancel the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278805</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>