<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1425 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278807</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant in a case involving the interception and seizure of battery scrap loaded on a truck under the Customs Act, 1962. The appellant successfully challenged the confiscation and penalty imposition, arguing lack of evidence to prove the goods&#039; origin and unauthorized importation. The Tribunal found no violation of Customs Act provisions, allowing the appeal and granting consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2019 06:06:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=559297" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1425 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278807</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant in a case involving the interception and seizure of battery scrap loaded on a truck under the Customs Act, 1962. The appellant successfully challenged the confiscation and penalty imposition, arguing lack of evidence to prove the goods&#039; origin and unauthorized importation. The Tribunal found no violation of Customs Act provisions, allowing the appeal and granting consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278807</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>