https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278796 Where limitation runs from the date of a decision, the decision is treated as passed only when it is communicated or otherwise made known to the parties with a reasonable opportunity to know its contents. On that basis, limitation for the suit began from communication, so the suit was not time-barred. On the boundary and drainage dispute, the court accepted the factual finding that the existing drainage channel corresponded to the former channel and that the alleged southern channel was not proved, supported by surrounding physical features, witness evidence, and older boundary descriptions. The finding on the merits was upheld and the dismissal with costs affirmed. en-us Fri, 29 Apr 1910 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Feb 2019 11:49:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278796 Where limitation runs from the date of a decision, the decision is treated as passed only when it is communicated or otherwise made known to the parties with a reasonable opportunity to know its contents. On that basis, limitation for the suit began from communication, so the suit was not time-barred. On the boundary and drainage dispute, the court accepted the factual finding that the existing drainage channel corresponded to the former channel and that the alleged southern channel was not proved, supported by surrounding physical features, witness evidence, and older boundary descriptions. The finding on the merits was upheld and the dismissal with costs affirmed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 29 Apr 1910 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278796