<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (4) TMI 40 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16921</link>
    <description>A binding administrative instruction on estate duty required summary assessment on the returned principal value where the prescribed limit was not exceeded, and permitted departure only in special cases with prior approval when Revenue detriment was shown. The Assessing Officer ignored that instruction and relied on a valuation cell report instead of the returned valuation. The assessment was therefore unsustainable to that extent, and estate duty had to be levied on the valuation returned by the accountable person rather than on any other basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:11:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55921" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (4) TMI 40 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16921</link>
      <description>A binding administrative instruction on estate duty required summary assessment on the returned principal value where the prescribed limit was not exceeded, and permitted departure only in special cases with prior approval when Revenue detriment was shown. The Assessing Officer ignored that instruction and relied on a valuation cell report instead of the returned valuation. The assessment was therefore unsustainable to that extent, and estate duty had to be levied on the valuation returned by the accountable person rather than on any other basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16921</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>