https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375590 The court disposed of the writ petition seeking a CENVAT refund as infructuous due to the extension of time for filing Tran-1 claims until March 31, 2019. Respondent No.2 disputed the petitioner's claim of filing Tran-1 on the online portal. The court directed the petitioner to apply for rectification of Tran-1 within 15 days, emphasizing that if the claim is rectified within this period, necessary action must be taken before the deadline. Consequently, the court deemed the petition unnecessary in light of the extended claim period and potential rectification. en-us Thu, 24 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Mar 2025 12:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375590 The court disposed of the writ petition seeking a CENVAT refund as infructuous due to the extension of time for filing Tran-1 claims until March 31, 2019. Respondent No.2 disputed the petitioner's claim of filing Tran-1 on the online portal. The court directed the petitioner to apply for rectification of Tran-1 within 15 days, emphasizing that if the claim is rectified within this period, necessary action must be taken before the deadline. Consequently, the court deemed the petition unnecessary in light of the extended claim period and potential rectification. Case-Laws GST Thu, 24 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375590