<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1214 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375587</link>
    <description>Special Leave Petitions were dismissed on an administrative basis under CBDT Circular No. 3 of 2018 because the tax effect was below the prescribed threshold. Delay was condoned, but the Court did not decide the substantive legal issue raised in the petitions and expressly left the question of law open for future consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2019 11:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=559195" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1214 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375587</link>
      <description>Special Leave Petitions were dismissed on an administrative basis under CBDT Circular No. 3 of 2018 because the tax effect was below the prescribed threshold. Delay was condoned, but the Court did not decide the substantive legal issue raised in the petitions and expressly left the question of law open for future consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375587</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>