<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1211 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375584</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Income Tax Appeal, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decisions on the capital nature of the sales tax exemption receipt and the deletion of the addition under section 80IA. The court relied on past judgments and legal consistency in determining that the receipts were capital in nature and that the deduction claimed by the assessee was valid, as the factual data did not support a deviation from past practices.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2019 17:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=559192" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1211 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375584</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Income Tax Appeal, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decisions on the capital nature of the sales tax exemption receipt and the deletion of the addition under section 80IA. The court relied on past judgments and legal consistency in determining that the receipts were capital in nature and that the deduction claimed by the assessee was valid, as the factual data did not support a deviation from past practices.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375584</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>