<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1197 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375570</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the rejection of the slump sale claim under Section 50B due to insufficient evidence. However, it directed a re-evaluation of the applicability of Section 50C to the leasehold property. The Tribunal also allowed the deduction under Section 43B for interest payments, instructing the Assessing Officer to verify the payment evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2019 12:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=559178" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1197 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375570</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the rejection of the slump sale claim under Section 50B due to insufficient evidence. However, it directed a re-evaluation of the applicability of Section 50C to the leasehold property. The Tribunal also allowed the deduction under Section 43B for interest payments, instructing the Assessing Officer to verify the payment evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375570</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>