<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1189 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375562</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal by the assessee, deleting the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of bonafide conduct and absence of contumacious behavior in penalty proceedings, aligning with established legal principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2019 06:22:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=559170" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1189 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375562</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal by the assessee, deleting the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of bonafide conduct and absence of contumacious behavior in penalty proceedings, aligning with established legal principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375562</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>