https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375552 The Tribunal determined that the appellant's activity did not constitute Manpower Recruitment or Supply Service as alleged by the department. The agreement was for executing specific work orders, not for supplying labor, and payment was based on work done, not the number of workers. As the workers were under the appellant's control, the Tribunal set aside the demand for service tax, interest, and penalties. The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order related to the specific company's payments was also set aside. en-us Tue, 19 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Feb 2019 06:19:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375552 The Tribunal determined that the appellant's activity did not constitute Manpower Recruitment or Supply Service as alleged by the department. The agreement was for executing specific work orders, not for supplying labor, and payment was based on work done, not the number of workers. As the workers were under the appellant's control, the Tribunal set aside the demand for service tax, interest, and penalties. The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order related to the specific company's payments was also set aside. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 19 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375552