https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375537 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT ALLAHABAD allowed the appeals in favor of the manufacturers of Hologram, holding that the assessment of goods manufactured and captively consumed should be done under Rule 8 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000, rather than Rule 11. The Tribunal emphasized that Rule 8 specifically covers captively consumed goods, making Rule 11 unnecessary for such assessments. Consequently, the impugned Orders-in-Original demanding duty under Rule 11 were deemed unsustainable, and the appellants were granted relief as per law. en-us Tue, 20 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Feb 2019 06:16:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375537 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT ALLAHABAD allowed the appeals in favor of the manufacturers of Hologram, holding that the assessment of goods manufactured and captively consumed should be done under Rule 8 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000, rather than Rule 11. The Tribunal emphasized that Rule 8 specifically covers captively consumed goods, making Rule 11 unnecessary for such assessments. Consequently, the impugned Orders-in-Original demanding duty under Rule 11 were deemed unsustainable, and the appellants were granted relief as per law. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 20 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375537