https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375530 Conviction under the NDPS Act and the Foreigners Act was not interfered with after the appellant gave up the challenge to the findings on guilt. The sentencing question was then assessed on mitigating circumstances, including long pendency, satisfactory jail conduct, absence of prior convictions, clean antecedents, health concerns, family circumstances, and custody already undergone, including time spent with the FRRO during trial. On that basis, the court treated the period already undergone as sufficient substantive punishment and modified the sentence accordingly, while leaving the remaining terms undisturbed. en-us Mon, 28 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Feb 2019 06:14:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375530 Conviction under the NDPS Act and the Foreigners Act was not interfered with after the appellant gave up the challenge to the findings on guilt. The sentencing question was then assessed on mitigating circumstances, including long pendency, satisfactory jail conduct, absence of prior convictions, clean antecedents, health concerns, family circumstances, and custody already undergone, including time spent with the FRRO during trial. On that basis, the court treated the period already undergone as sufficient substantive punishment and modified the sentence accordingly, while leaving the remaining terms undisturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 28 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375530