<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 1338 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278785</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the Assessee, setting aside the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for alleged inaccurate particulars of income. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of providing an opportunity to be heard before imposing penalties and ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that the levy of penalty was not justified based on the facts and applicable legal precedent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2019 06:13:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=559137" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 1338 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278785</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the Assessee, setting aside the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for alleged inaccurate particulars of income. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of providing an opportunity to be heard before imposing penalties and ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that the levy of penalty was not justified based on the facts and applicable legal precedent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278785</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>