https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278791 The court set aside the order rejecting the petitioner's application for a stay on the collection of the balanced disputed tax pending appeal by the A.P. VAT Tribunal. The court found the rejection unjustified as the petitioner had already paid 50% of the disputed tax, exceeding the usual 25% requirement for a stay. It directed that no coercive steps be taken for the remaining 50% until the appeal's final decision. The writ petition was disposed of with pending miscellaneous petitions closed, and no costs were awarded. en-us Fri, 16 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Feb 2019 06:13:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278791 The court set aside the order rejecting the petitioner's application for a stay on the collection of the balanced disputed tax pending appeal by the A.P. VAT Tribunal. The court found the rejection unjustified as the petitioner had already paid 50% of the disputed tax, exceeding the usual 25% requirement for a stay. It directed that no coercive steps be taken for the remaining 50% until the appeal's final decision. The writ petition was disposed of with pending miscellaneous petitions closed, and no costs were awarded. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 16 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278791